| odprtje racuna v tujini | ||
|---|---|---|
|
jan1024188
6. apr 2011 21:12:11
Pridružen od: 3. dec 2010 112 objav 70 158 6 |
||
|
Mambo89
6. apr 2011 21:28:09
Pridružen od: 23. feb 2009 2840 objav 2286 560 46 |
#12
Maš tudi druge strokovnjake, le malo pogooglaj in zaprosi za informativne ponudbe/cenike. |
|
|
perunpro
6. apr 2011 21:45:46
Pridružen od: 23. maj 2008 3360 objav 2892 217 19 |
#13
Davcna optimizacija != davcna utaja ali goljufija. Previdno, da ne bo izkusnja boleca. 5 let je zastaralni rok in ko si enkrat v primezu davcne, te zlepa ne spusti. Posvetuj se s kakim racunovodstvom, davcnim svetovalcem in podobno. Racun v tujini ti ne pomaga kaj dosti, dokler si davcni rezident RS (govorim za fizicno osebo), razen ce zopet ne gres na temno stran. |
|
|
Mambo89
6. apr 2011 22:16:25
Pridružen od: 23. feb 2009 2840 objav 2286 560 46 |
#14
perunpro, ne vem ali je != kakšna funkcija v katerem od programskih jezikov, ampak če si hotel povedati, da je to pogosto enako, se s tem ne morem strinjati in za voljo mladih rodov in pozitivne podjetniške vzgoje, ne govorit tega podjetnikom in jih strašit. Sicer pa lahko s prve roke povem, ker berem eno ekonomsko knjigo, da sem zelo zaskrbljen nad "rdeče intervencijsko" obarvano literaturo, ki jo rinejo na ekonomskem faksu. Potem pa se ljudje čudijo, ko bojda ugledni podjetniki in managerji dajejo izjave v smislu, da bi država morala subvencionirati to in ono, ker so se sami zakalkulirali pri investicijah. Da ne zatavam, se vrnimo nazaj na davke. Pri zdravi pameti, ne moreš bit jezen na nekoga, ki se znajde, če ob tem ne krši nobenega zakona?! Lepo, da opozoriš na rok za zastaranje, ampak strašenje je tukaj res odveč. |
|
|
schtr4jh
6. apr 2011 22:32:48
Pridružen od: 24. nov 2008 402 objav 322 33 4 |
||
|
Mambo89
6. apr 2011 22:37:09
Pridružen od: 23. feb 2009 2840 objav 2286 560 46 |
#16
LOL:) Sem bil preoster potem. Mah, če pa perunpro v tovrstnih debatah pogosto pove, da je treba skrbet za socialo in plačat davke:) |
|
|
perunpro
7. apr 2011 00:41:46
Pridružen od: 23. maj 2008 3360 objav 2892 217 19 |
#17
Mambo89, kot je schtr4jh povedal, tist znak pomen da to ni enako. Mislim tudi, da bi se dalo to videti tudi od ostalih napisanih stvari... Glede ostalega: ni cisto tko, ampak nej ti bo. Recimo da vse alternative, ki jih vidim, so precej slabse :) Davke pa placas vedno in povsod. In kolikor spremljam, vecina ne ve, kaj je davcna optimizacija in kaj davcna utaja. Pa meja ni niti tako tanka ali zmuzljiva. Kje je potem sele etika in morala :D |
|
|
Jure Damjan
7. apr 2011 08:41:58
Pridružen od: 4. okt 2007 4162 objav 4222 446 55 |
#18
Ne drzi... Velike korporacije kot so Google, MS... celo v US, ki je najbolj zatezena glede davkov, plačajo le 2-3% davka za offshore (non-US) dobicek. Podobne poti obstajajo tudi za navadne firme in državljanje, le da ti bypassi nekaj stanejo in se splačajo šele pri določenem prometu. So popolnoma legalni. Obstajajo pa še cenejše poti. |
|
|
Jure Damjan
7. apr 2011 09:41:18
Pridružen od: 4. okt 2007 4162 objav 4222 446 55 |
#19
Sicer ni direktno povezano... ampak za ilustracijo. 1.Exxon Mobil made $19 billion in profits in 2009. Exxon not only paid no federal income taxes, it actually received a $156 million rebate from the IRS, according to its SEC filings. 2.Bank of America received a $1.9 billion tax refund from the IRS last year, although it made $4.4 billion in profits and received a bailout from the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department of nearly $1 trillion. 3.Over the past five years, while General Electric made $26 billion in profits in the United States, it received a $4.1 billion refund from the IRS. 4.Chevron received a $19 million refund from the IRS last year after it made $10 billion in profits in 2009. 5.Boeing, which received a $30 billion contract from the Pentagon to build 179 airborne tankers, got a $124 million refund from the IRS last year. 6.Valero Energy, the 25th largest company in America with $68 billion in sales last year received a $157 million tax refund check from the IRS and, over the past three years, it received a $134 million tax break from the oil and gas manufacturing tax deduction. 7.Goldman Sachs in 2008 only paid 1.1 percent of its income in taxes even though it earned a profit of $2.3 billion and received an almost $800 billion from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury Department. 8.Citigroup last year made more than $4 billion in profits but paid no federal income taxes. It received a $2.5 trillion bailout from the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury. 9.ConocoPhillips, the fifth largest oil company in the United States, made $16 billion in profits from 2007 through 2009, but received $451 million in tax breaks through the oil and gas manufacturing deduction. 10.Over the past five years, Carnival Cruise Lines made more than $11 billion in profits, but its federal income tax rate during those years was just 1.1 percent. |
|