Bralnik - www.f-roots.net

8 naročnikov

Kot prvo ne vprašat zakaj taka domena. Domeno imam na voljo in je pač na to padlo, mogoče če vsaj malo zaživi zadeva, registriram kako bolj ustrezno domeno.

Mislim da mi ni potrebno prav posebej poudarjati, za kaj gre. Pod zapisi so tudi linki do "diggov", tak so vključeni tudi slovenski. (če sem kakšnega spregledal, bi prosil za linke)

No evo še link ... http://www.f-roots.net

P.S.: Stran temelji na enem že spisanem sistemu, ampak je dokaj spremenjena vsaj kar se tiče vpisovanja, itd.

Prosim pa za kak vpis, da bo vsaj kaj vsebine :D

@toast:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66359

Duplicate content generally refers to substantive blocks of content within or across domains that either completely match other content or are appreciably similar. Mostly, this is not deceptive in origin. Examples of non-malicious duplicate content could include:

* Discussion forums that can generate both regular and stripped-down pages targeted at mobile devices
* Store items shown or linked via multiple distinct URLs
* Printer-only versions of web pages

However, in some cases, content is deliberately duplicated across domains in an attempt to manipulate search engine rankings or win more traffic. Deceptive practices like this can result in a poor user experience, when a visitor sees substantially the same content repeated within a set of search results.

If you find that another site is duplicating your content by scraping (misappropriating and republishing) it, it's unlikely that this will negatively impact your site's ranking in Google search results pages. If you do spot a case that's particularly frustrating, you are welcome to file a DMCA request to claim ownership of the content and request removal of the other site from Google's index.

ja... in? preberi to kar si tukaj skopiral - tokrat z razumevanjem...

hmm.. kater del ti ni jasen? cesa ne razumes?

si pogledal celoten link do konca.. skopiral sem ti tista dva dela, ki bi ju moral poznati.. ostalo je na linku..

bo slo?

uzivaj..

If you find that another site is duplicating your content by scraping (misappropriating and republishing) it, it's unlikely that this will negatively impact your site's ranking in Google search results pages

Torej je tebi lahko popolnoma vseeno, predvsem zaradi tega, ker sem 1000% da google malo prej poindeksira tvoj blog kot en ta agregat...

@preseren: poglej moj blog, moj pr in poglej ene par linkov, ki so na googlu.. in potem ti bo jasno, da imam zaradi tega probleme.. ali drugace.. zadnje pol meseca me ne indeksira google.. in sem se odlocil, da zacnem pizditi nad taksnimi stvarmi..

in ja, vem da tezim, ampak moja izkusnja je pac taksna..

jst, ne bom več debatiral o tem, se mi zdi brez pomena.
Vsak je svojega mnenja, z google se pa nikoli ne ve k je vse v meglo zavito...

spomnim se kako so vsi pred še pred kratkim kričali "user friendly urls!!!!" ... pol pa google objavi tole pa vsi čudno gledajo - http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html

vse ima svoj kako in zakaj in svoje meje... če tebe druge strani citirajo in linkajo, ni stem nič narobe... če bi bilo, pol ne bi obstajal web 2.o

ce te citirajo in ce te linkajo.. ce pa samo kopirajo rss-e, brez linkanja, pa je nekaj drugega..

ok... ampak, ponavadi je linkano...

Em a ni linkano ?

pa ne povsod! ravno v tem je problem.. recimo tukaj je vsaj linkano z preberi zapis..