Na kratko, če se najdi.si drži standardov, potem bi se vse, kar je povezano s prejšnjim URLjem, ob 301 redirectu moralo prenesti:
10.3.2 301 Moved Permanently
The requested resource has been assigned a new permanent URI and any future references to this resource SHOULD use one of the returned URIs. Clients with link editing capabilities ought to automatically re-link references to the Request-URI to one or more of the new references returned by the server, where possible. This response is cacheable unless indicated otherwise.
The new permanent URI SHOULD be given by the Location field in the response. Unless the request method was HEAD, the entity of the response SHOULD contain a short hypertext note with a hyperlink to the new URI(s).
If the 301 status code is received in response to a request other than GET or HEAD, the user agent MUST NOT automatically redirect the request unless it can be confirmed by the user, since this might change the conditions under which the request was issued.
Odgovarjam pač tistim, ki kar na pamet klamfajo neke neumnosti, zanesljivega odgovora Ernestu, kako je v takih primerih z najdi.si, ne vem, mogoče bi pa lahko tukaj kaj pomagal rokz, kajne? :)